mirror of
https://github.com/monero-project/monero-site.git
synced 2025-01-18 23:53:42 +02:00
fix meeting logs and small issue in merchants.yml
This commit is contained in:
Riccardo Spagni
parent
3f370cb5e3
commit
e80c0cb4fc
@ -52,8 +52,8 @@
|
||||
url: https://github.com/PsychicCat/monero-php
|
||||
- category: Tools
|
||||
merchants:
|
||||
+ - name: nestorgames
|
||||
+ url: http://www.nestorgames.com
|
||||
- name: nestorgames
|
||||
url: http://www.nestorgames.com
|
||||
- name: ForkGuard Network Monitoring
|
||||
url: http://forkguard.com
|
||||
- name: MoneroBase Price Charts and Tools
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
layout: post
|
||||
title: Logs for the Kovri Dev Meeting Held on 2016-09-11
|
||||
summary: Brief review of what has been completed since last meeting, Kovri Logo, code & open tickets discussion
|
||||
tags: [dev diaries, i2p, crypto]**
|
||||
summary: Kovri Logo, code & open tickets discussion
|
||||
tags: [dev diaries, i2p, crypto]
|
||||
author: dEBRUYNE / fluffypony
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ author: dEBRUYNE / fluffypony
|
||||
**\<lurker>** 146
|
||||
**\<fluffypony>** hyc: it's coz of Garlic Routing
|
||||
**\<Elli0t>** 88
|
||||
**\<MalMen>** for example "getthis" would bedificuld to understund with no "get_this", but i like "getThis" too, I think I got that from javascript
|
||||
**\<MalMen>** for example "getthis" would bedificuld to understund with no "get\_this", but i like "getThis" too, I think I got that from javascript
|
||||
**\<hyc>** yes, I see that, but ...
|
||||
**\<fluffypony>** MalMen: can you take it to PM with tewinget, or wait till after the Kovri meeting?
|
||||
**\<tewinget>** MalMen: if you want to discuss that, PM me, otherwise try to wait until the Kovri meeting concludes.
|
||||
@ -42,8 +42,8 @@ author: dEBRUYNE / fluffypony
|
||||
**\<fluffypony>** and yeah, the brand recognition aspect is +1
|
||||
**\<i2p-relay> {-guzzi}** #239
|
||||
**\<tooquick_4u>** #146
|
||||
**\<meeting-bot> [i2p-relay] {-moneromooo}** I kinda like https://images-contests.99static.com/wYofliD7HjSVmkBoYhGS4CyMeNc=/188x0:1464x1276/500x500/top/smart/99designs-contests-attachments/75/75384/attachment_75384769, the variants of https://images-contests.99static.com/Gs4VClupDwKJEGKvaX7I40TLckg=/0x0:1156x1156/500x500/top/smart/99designs-contests-
|
||||
**\<meeting-bot> attachments/75/75381/attachment_75381142
|
||||
**\<meeting-bot> [i2p-relay] {-moneromooo}** I kinda like https://images-contests.99static.com/wYofliD7HjSVmkBoYhGS4CyMeNc=/188x0:1464x1276/500x500/top/smart/99designs-contests-attachments/75/75384/attachment\_75384769, the variants of https://images-contests.99static.com/Gs4VClupDwKJEGKvaX7I40TLckg=/0x0:1156x1156/500x500/top/smart/99designs-contests-
|
||||
**\<meeting-bot>** attachments/75/75381/attachment\_75381142
|
||||
**\<tewinget>** wait, isn't 99designs basically spec-work?
|
||||
**\<meeting-bot> [i2p-relay] {-ArticMine}** Kovri logo Do we want a variant of the Monero logo or something entirely different?
|
||||
**\<meeting-bot> [anonimal]** But why get washed in with more corporatism? We're at a juncture to break some molds here.
|
||||
@ -110,19 +110,19 @@ author: dEBRUYNE / fluffypony
|
||||
**\<fluffypony>** they are, moneromooo, but I don't think they'll be confused enough to care
|
||||
**\<fluffypony>** it's not like people make privacy decisions based on routing models :-P
|
||||
**\<ferretinjapan>** yeah i think the garlic just looks confusing.
|
||||
**\<meeting-bot> [anonimal]** So should we do a vote of "anything *not* 239"?
|
||||
**\<meeting-bot> [anonimal]** So should we do a vote of "anything \*not* 239"?
|
||||
**\<hyc>** yeah. it's close enough. several of the others leave me wondering WTH they are.
|
||||
**\<_Slack> <xmr_eric>** The one option I'm not seeing is a direct copy of the Monero (M). I did a quick mockup: https://i.imgur.com/8wIh8Hb.png
|
||||
**\<meeting-bot> [anonimal]** Strong opinions on *not* 239?
|
||||
**\<\_Slack> <xmr\_eric>** The one option I'm not seeing is a direct copy of the Monero (M). I did a quick mockup: https://i.imgur.com/8wIh8Hb.png
|
||||
**\<meeting-bot> [anonimal]** Strong opinions on \*not* 239?
|
||||
**\<meeting-bot> [i2p-relay] {-moneromooo}** Well... "I use kovri, that's a privacy program for that onion type thing"
|
||||
**\<meeting-bot> [anonimal]** How can we improve #239?
|
||||
**\<fluffypony>** otoh I don't think I've ever heard a non-technical person talk about onion routing, moneromooo
|
||||
**\<medusa_>** personally i also like 245, the green symbols strong roots
|
||||
**\<pero>** 239 needs a different font and some kerning
|
||||
**\<MalMen>** we can allways tell "we use garlic instead of union to keep vampires away from the network"
|
||||
**\<fluffypony>** xmr_eric: there were a bunch of those, like hundreds of them, we rejected them in favour of #239
|
||||
**\<fluffypony>** xmr\_eric: there were a bunch of those, like hundreds of them, we rejected them in favour of #239
|
||||
**\<meeting-bot> [i2p-relay] {-ArticMine}** 239 Possible confusion with Tor. Could be dicey from a trademark perspective
|
||||
**\<_Slack> <xmr_eric>** cool
|
||||
**\<\_Slack> <xmr\_eric>** cool
|
||||
**\<meeting-bot> [EinMByte]** #239 looks nice
|
||||
**\<meeting-bot> [EinMByte]** Don't think there would be trademark issues
|
||||
**\<meeting-bot> [anonimal]** medusa_ I like the logo but not so much the colour.
|
||||
@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ author: dEBRUYNE / fluffypony
|
||||
**\<meeting-bot> [i2p-relay] {-moneromooo}** Then... we could superimpose: 239 with added arms on top of the monero M, trying to hide it :D
|
||||
**\<pero>** i think my the minimal pacmans from 88 and 81 arent bad either
|
||||
**\<fluffypony>** anonimal: what are your thoughts on the "connection to Monero" thing - do we want it to be more tightly coupled or not?
|
||||
**\<hyc>** then xmr_eric's would be fine
|
||||
**\<hyc>** then xmr\_eric's would be fine
|
||||
**\<meeting-bot> [anonimal]** fluffypony ferretinjapan lurker: if the artists can somehow come up with a better idea other than slapping a big K in the style of monero onto the garlic, then I'm open to new ideas
|
||||
**\<meeting-bot> [guzzi]** fluffypony i agree if there needs to be aconnection to monero that is important to discussion on 239
|
||||
**\<hyc>** or at least a starting point. maybe turn the circle background into the garlic
|
||||
@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ author: dEBRUYNE / fluffypony
|
||||
**\<meeting-bot> [anonimal]** Let's decide on 1 and see how we can improve it.
|
||||
**\<tewinget>** I think maybe since there are so many opinions we shelf this for now, make a shortlist of 10 or so, and discuss among just those at a later time.
|
||||
**\<meeting-bot> [anonimal]** I'm voting #239
|
||||
**\<meeting-bot> [guzzi] we ef have two camps here. use a letter like Monero logo or -- somethinge else00
|
||||
**\<meeting-bot> [guzzi]** we ef have two camps here. use a letter like Monero logo or -- somethinge else00
|
||||
**\<fluffypony>** we have 8 days to make a decision, tewinget
|
||||
**\<hyc>** shrink them down to 16x16 favicons, most of them will look like garbage
|
||||
**\<fluffypony>** tbh I kinda like #239 too
|
||||
@ -175,12 +175,12 @@ author: dEBRUYNE / fluffypony
|
||||
**\<fluffypony>** also we can ALWAYS change it later
|
||||
**\<pero>** hyc except for 135 and 134
|
||||
**\<fluffypony>** not like we have a branding department to report to
|
||||
**\<pero>** i think tus_99 definitely has the best handle on the design
|
||||
**\<pero>** i think tus\_99 definitely has the best handle on the design
|
||||
**\<hyc>** ok, 135 isn't bad.
|
||||
**\<pero>** and squarepoint the best typography
|
||||
**\<fluffypony>** anonimal: as the CEO of Kovri (kidding) you get to decide, I think you've heard enough opinions, and we'll defer to you
|
||||
**\<meeting-bot> [anonimal]** fluffypony: thank you
|
||||
**\<meeting-bot> [anonimal]** #239 it is *but* we should work out font and see if artist can improve the idea.
|
||||
**\<meeting-bot> [anonimal]** #239 it is \*but* we should work out font and see if artist can improve the idea.
|
||||
**\<fluffypony>** absolutely
|
||||
**\<fluffypony>** I'll finalise the 99designs competition in the next couple of days, and give the artist final direction
|
||||
**\<meeting-bot> [anonimal]** Who here had thoughts about kerning, etc.?
|
||||
@ -200,7 +200,7 @@ author: dEBRUYNE / fluffypony
|
||||
**\<fluffypony>** and we can modify it from there
|
||||
**\<meeting-bot> [anonimal]** Ok great
|
||||
**\<meeting-bot> [anonimal]** So, resolved with #239?
|
||||
**\<meeting-bot> [i2p-relay] {-ArticMine} I have to leave now
|
||||
**\<meeting-bot> [i2p-relay] {-ArticMine}** I have to leave now
|
||||
**\<meeting-bot> [anonimal]** Thanks ArticMine
|
||||
**\<meeting-bot> [EinMByte]** anonimal: Yes, let's move on
|
||||
**\<fluffypony>** indeed
|
||||
@ -278,7 +278,7 @@ author: dEBRUYNE / fluffypony
|
||||
**\<fluffypony>** anonimal: both
|
||||
**\<fluffypony>** can't think of anything else
|
||||
**\<fluffypony>** re: 33C3 I'll be putting a post up on the forum in the next little while so everyone knows what's potting
|
||||
**\<meeting-bot> * anonimal checking issues
|
||||
**\<meeting-bot>** anonimal checking issues
|
||||
**\<meeting-bot> [anonimal]** Ok, they've been milestone'd
|
||||
**\<fluffypony>** awesomesauce
|
||||
**\<fluffypony>** when shall we three meeting again? (to quote Macbeth)
|
||||
@ -287,7 +287,7 @@ author: dEBRUYNE / fluffypony
|
||||
**\<meeting-bot> [anonimal]** (4. Code + ticket discussion / Q & A)
|
||||
**\<fluffypony>** nothing from my side
|
||||
**\<meeting-bot> [EinMByte]** So what I'm currently working (of the milestoned issues): #191, #312, #342
|
||||
**\<meeting-bot> [guzzi] i will keep working on coverety isues
|
||||
**\<meeting-bot>** [guzzi] i will keep working on coverety isues
|
||||
**\<meeting-bot> [EinMByte]** Will do #213 later
|
||||
**\<meeting-bot> [EinMByte]** For the memory leaks (and other memory problems): the ntcp branch has a couple of fixes
|
||||
**\<meeting-bot> [EinMByte]** Currently working on a (partial) fix of #342
|
||||
@ -306,14 +306,14 @@ author: dEBRUYNE / fluffypony
|
||||
**\<meeting-bot> [EinMByte]** For #187 (NTCP core issues), the main thing left to fix is the inbound NTCP
|
||||
**\<meeting-bot> [anonimal]** I just don't assign myself in case someone else wants to grab something
|
||||
**\<meeting-bot> [anonimal]** EinMByte: yeah, running tcpdump against kovri --log-to-console 0 --v6 1 --enable-ssu 0
|
||||
**\<meeting-bot> * anonimal pasting
|
||||
**\<meeting-bot>** \* anonimal pasting
|
||||
**\<meeting-bot> [EinMByte]** Yes, and I'd ask everyone else wanting to help out to do the same
|
||||
**\<meeting-bot> [anonimal]** 19:42:20.974119 IP6 2001:0:9d38:6ab8:2c92:2e09:b8ee:e2d.59823 > me.11552: Flags [S], seq 1067814148, win 8192, options [mss 1220,nop,wscale 8,nop,nop,sackOK], length 0
|
||||
**\<meeting-bot> [anonimal]** 19:42:28.017709 IP6 2001:0:9d38:6ab8:2c92:2e09:b8ee:e2d.59823 > me.11552: Flags [S], seq 1067814148, win 8192, options [mss 1220,nop,nop,sackOK], length 0
|
||||
**\<meeting-bot> [EinMByte]** guzzi: Try this if you get bored with coverity issues
|
||||
**\<meeting-bot> [anonimal]** Let's take mroe NTCP chat outside of the meeting since this is being logged
|
||||
**\<meeting-bot> [EinMByte]** (--v6 not necessary, just see if you get inbound traffic, and paste logs when you do)
|
||||
**\<meeting-bot> [anonimal]** *more
|
||||
**\<meeting-bot> [anonimal]** \*more
|
||||
**\<meeting-bot> [anonimal]** Yes, I know, just happens to be the instance that is running
|
||||
**\<meeting-bot> [EinMByte]** ok
|
||||
**\<meeting-bot> [anonimal]** guzzi any questions about tickets, etc.?
|
||||
@ -329,11 +329,11 @@ author: dEBRUYNE / fluffypony
|
||||
**\<fluffypony>** going once, going twice, sold!
|
||||
**\<meeting-bot> [anonimal]** 6. Confirm next meeting date/time
|
||||
**\<meeting-bot> [EinMByte]** What about the website, though?
|
||||
**\<meeting-bot> * anonimal backtracks to 5.
|
||||
**\<meeting-bot>** * anonimal backtracks to 5.
|
||||
**\<meeting-bot> [EinMByte]** (or did I just miss that)
|
||||
**\<meeting-bot> [anonimal]** fluffypony: do you have any details yet?
|
||||
**\<fluffypony>** EinMByte: I said that now that we're wrapping up the logo I can get back on the bandwagon with that
|
||||
**\<meeting-bot> [anonimal]** And it *will* be online by first release fluffypony, yes?
|
||||
**\<meeting-bot> [anonimal]** And it \*will\* be online by first release fluffypony, yes?
|
||||
**\<fluffypony>** absolutely
|
||||
**\<meeting-bot> [EinMByte]** Well, it was supposed to be done by today
|
||||
**\<meeting-bot> [anonimal]** lol, EinMByte cracking the whip
|
||||
|
||||
@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ author: dEBRUYNE / fluffypony
|
||||
**\<fluffypony>** Ok so tewinget let me ask about the backwards-compatible stub
|
||||
**\<fluffypony>** Coz obviously we still need a stub for those that insist on touching the daemon using old RPC
|
||||
**\<fluffypony>** Is that just a matter of refactoring it out of the daemon?
|
||||
**\<tewinget>** well...so *my* plan was to leave the old RPC in place until we decide "yea, that's for sure deprecated and gonna be removed now"
|
||||
**\<tewinget>** well...so \*my* plan was to leave the old RPC in place until we decide "yea, that's for sure deprecated and gonna be removed now"
|
||||
**\<fluffypony>** That's fine - I meant as a later exercise
|
||||
**\<fluffypony>** Just trying to gauge the amount of effort it's going to take
|
||||
**\<tewinget>** hmm, well, a wrapper around the old RPC to hook into the new wouldn't be *too* hard...
|
||||
@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ author: dEBRUYNE / fluffypony
|
||||
**\<hyc>** so anyone mining testnet right now should stop
|
||||
**\<moneromooo>** Unless you want to test stuff.
|
||||
**\<iDunk>** i exported the raw blockchain up to 800499. that's before v3, right?
|
||||
**\<tewinget>** well that's not entirely necessary >**_>**
|
||||
**\<tewinget>** well that's not entirely necessary >\*\*\_>\*\*
|
||||
**\<moneromooo>** Yes.
|
||||
**\<iDunk>** and v4 is... ?
|
||||
**\<iDunk>** 802000 or so iirc ?
|
||||
|
||||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user