Brief review of what has been completed since last meeting, discussion of meta issues, and code & open tickets discussion
dev diaries
i2p
crypto
dEBRUYNE / fluffypony
Logs
<anonimal> 1. Greetings <anonimal> 2. Brief review of what's been completed since the previous meeting <anonimal> 3. Contributor FFS check-in / status <anonimal> 4. Open Meta issue review https://github.com/monero-project/meta/issues <anonimal> 5. Code + ticket discussion / Q & A <anonimal> 6. Any additional meeting items <anonimal> 7. Confirm next meeting date/time <anonimal> Hello! :) <MoroccanMalinois> hi <rehrar> Yo <ArticMine> hi <anonimal> Hi MoroccanMalinois rehrar ArticMine <anonimal> fluffypony too? <i2p-relay> {-fluffypony} yes <anonimal> Hi fluffypony <anonimal> 2. Brief review of what's been completed since the previous meeting <anonimal> On my end: testnet development and related collab with MoroccanMalinois and lazygravy + SSU/Ident collab/PR review with MoroccanMalinois (and related research/development), rehrar collab for his site related work, some collab with serhack/ericcion Italian translations for kovri-site, email + PR collab + R&D with rbrunner on the windows InnoSetup installers, Monero project work (monero svn to git for <anonimal> unbound), work with pigeons on setting up kovri.i2p (now online!), answer various IRC/reddit Q&A + related collab. <rehrar> This past week was launching the Monero website. Now that's basically done. <anonimal> Some various things here and there, I2P/Tor family node research and more. <anonimal> Some French + Russian kovri-site translations are in the works, they are in the PR pit. <anonimal> Same with kovri repo, I have yet to review the new MM PR's. <anonimal> Did we miss anything else? <anonimal> 3. Contributor FFS check-in / status <anonimal> I'm here, checked-in! MoroccanMalinois is here. Yay! <MoroccanMalinois> i will be ok with a milestone in next meeting if last PR's get merged :) <anonimal> Excellent, I'm sure they will. <anonimal> re: FFS check-in, MoroccanMalinois is doing great. I can't review myself, anyone else on point 3.? <anonimal> Well, I can review myself, but that wouldn't be fair now would it? ;) <MoroccanMalinois> lol <i2p-relay> {-fluffypony} lol <i2p-relay> {-fluffypony} leave it to the community to review <anonimal> With the exception of this intermittent week, point 2 shows that I've been active and busy, that I can say the least. <anonimal> Alright, moving on. 4. Open Meta issue review https://github.com/monero-project/meta/issues <anonimal> Starting from the top down, #80 <anonimal> rehrar, any news on that front? <anonimal> #77 and #78, fluffypony what do you think? <i2p-relay> {-fluffypony} checking <rehrar> Sorry. Afk 2 min <i2p-relay> {-fluffypony} what's a topic <i2p-relay> {-fluffypony} lol <i2p-relay> {-fluffypony} anonimal: won't web hooks for -site and -docs be too distracting? <rehrar> This week is all Kovri for me. <rehrar> I'll be writing the brief tomorrow and presenting it <anonimal> fluffypony: well, not for me: it would be helpful because of the sometimes very large notification lists I get in github. <rehrar> I'll also be importing the tech from the new Monero website to Kovri. That which is applicable. <anonimal> Awesome rehrar <anonimal> fluffypony: is it too much? <i2p-relay> {-fluffypony} I don't mind activating it, it's your call :) <anonimal> Can we give it a trial run? <anonimal> (e.g., do it until too many people complain) <serhack> Hey anonimal <serhack> How are you? <anonimal> fluffypony: re: topics, quick link https://help.github.com/articles/classifying-your-repository-with-topics/ <anonimal> Hi serhack <i2p-relay> {-fluffypony} tks <anonimal> serhack: sono stanco, ma we can chat more after the meeting <ArticMine> On 4 there is Project licensing #85 impacts kovri <serhack> Oh okay <ArticMine> Was opened to get feedback <rehrar> Kovri doesn't have to have the same license as Monero, right? <anonimal> ArticMine: I took a quick look at that earlier this week, will look again now. <i2p-relay> {-fluffypony} rehrar not necessarily, but might be better if we did <moneromooo> kovri's library part will be used by monero at some point. <i2p-relay> {-fluffypony} I don't see a reason to have different licenses <anonimal> BSD-3, yes I believe so. <anonimal> re: licensing, no matter what, we'd need to adhere to the licenses of all bundled dependencies, right? <ArticMine> Yes <ArticMine> That is part of the issue in 85 <ArticMine> I2P is effectively GPL v2 <moneromooo> "I2P" ? The Java router ? <ArticMine> Yes java <anonimal> Huh? Java I2P? <ArticMine> java makes I2P GPL v2 <anonimal> I don't see how that applies to us as we're not using any of their code. <anonimal> And most of the important bits are "free (adj.): unencumbered; not under the control of others", whichever license that equates to. <ArticMine> Not directly to kovri <anonimal> Open specification is different than implementation in terms of licensing, right? <ArticMine> but that is why 5 was opened to deal with this discussion <ArticMine> 85 <anonimal> If monero goes dual-license, then we must? <ArticMine> Not necessarily <anonimal> Ok. I'll need more thought on this. I can add to the next agenda too. Does anyone have any strong feelings on this now? <ArticMine> I think it is best if we discuss it on Github under 85 <ArticMine> Then we can look at it in the next meeting <rehrar> I have strong feelings to go proprietary. <moneromooo> er, we would not do that. <rehrar> But aside from that let's move on. <rehrar> I kid. <anonimal> ArticMine: ok. <anonimal> re: #63, rehrar did you figure out your git branching issue? <rehrar> Web launch took priority. <rehrar> We've been feverishly working on it and it is done for now. I've been reading into branches yes. <rehrar> Sorry, also headed to Mexico atm. :/ So my replies will be intermittent. <rehrar> Should be resolved in the next two days. <anonimal> I haven't made any new contributions to it yet so I don't think it's done for now ;) <rehrar> No, I meant the website <rehrar> Working in the website and the site is done for now. <anonimal> Ok <anonimal> re: #46, fluffypony are we still scheduled for the 20th? <i2p-relay> {-fluffypony} I have no idea - I don't have it in my calendar, has someone checked with Shay? <anonimal> Eek, I thought he sent an email after he posted in #46 * anonimal will ping him right now <i2p-relay> {-fluffypony} tks <anonimal> I have a feeling he may have been waiting for more responses. <anonimal> #43, hmm <rehrar> This week. ;) <rehrar> First step is to nail down #80 imo <rehrar> Because then I can start producing some material. <anonimal> I think rehrar had thoughts on that area. Sounds like everyone is at max capacity at the moment though. <anonimal> Ok <anonimal> fluffypony, is #12 still applicable? <i2p-relay> {-fluffypony} checking <i2p-relay> {-fluffypony} yes - label bot took precedence <i2p-relay> {-fluffypony} but we'll pick that up after it's deployed <rehrar> Spoke to @fluffypony, could be resolved as early as next week <rehrar> Over one year ago. :P <i2p-relay> {-fluffypony} lol <i2p-relay> {-fluffypony} we had to choose a mail provider <i2p-relay> {-fluffypony} that took multiple face-to-face meetings <anonimal> Oh neat, label bot is online <rehrar> Can we give him a better name? <i2p-relay> {-fluffypony} only in meta right now <moneromooo> Oooh, where is the documentation ? <anonimal> Oh lol, I see, rehrar quoted my kovri comment from March 16th, 2016, heh X) <anonimal> fluffypony: so #12 is applicable but not finished? <i2p-relay> {-fluffypony} yes <anonimal> Ok <i2p-relay> {-fluffypony} @rehrar ask pigeons <rehrar> Will do. <anonimal> #9 #19 #29 #30 are pigeons territory I believe. <anonimal> Anything else on this point (meta issue review)? <anonimal> #24 #26 #27 will be useful. ajs waits patiently on #27. We can eventually make a big move on #27 when the time comes. That should be fun. <anonimal> Out of time, 5. Code + ticket discussion / Q & A <anonimal> Nothing pressing at the moment aside from the open PR's which will be reviewed. <anonimal> Anything else on 5.? <anonimal> 6. Any additional meeting items <anonimal> Nothing from me at the moment. ArticMine how urgent was meta #85 in terms of coming to a resolution? <rehrar> I think we gucci. <ArticMine> I would give it at least two weeks <ArticMine> Once we see discussion / comments <rehrar> K. Going to be crossing soon, so I'm out for now. Cya all Kovri Peeps. <ArticMine> It was promoted by a Monero dependency going to a copyleft <anonimal> Ok <anonimal> 7. Confirm next meeting date/time <anonimal> Same time, two weeks from now? <anonimal> rehrar will you be back by then? <rehrar> It's a day trip. <rehrar> I live like right next to the border. <rehrar> Ill be back before my day is over, and right to work tomorrow. <anonimal> Oh, alright, then we'll keep the usual meeting date/time. <anonimal> Thanks everyone :) <endogenic> thanks anonimal :)