mirror of
https://github.com/monero-project/monero-site.git
synced 2024-12-15 12:56:36 +02:00
983cc334a8
- Updated README to accomodate for changes - Updated footer and roadmap for multi-lingual readiness - Updated yml files for an 'untranslated' string - Added an 'untranslated' snippet to all untranslated files - Added a 'template' language for new languages to be made easily - Added link to Monerujo site to Downloads page - CSS updates
25 lines
2.0 KiB
Markdown
25 lines
2.0 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
layout: moneropedia
|
|
entry: "Pedersen Commitment"
|
|
terms: ["commitments", "commitment", "pedersen"]
|
|
summary: "Pedersen commitments are cryptographic algorythms that allow a prover to commit to a certain value without revealing it or being able to change it."
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
### The Basics
|
|
|
|
When you spend Monero, the value of the inputs that you are spending and the value of the outputs you are sending are encrypted and opaque to everyone except the recipient of each of those outputs. Pedersen commitments allow you to send Monero without revealing the value of the transactions. Pedersen commitments also make it possible for people to verify that transactions on the blockchain are valid and not creating Monero out of thin air.
|
|
|
|
### What It Means
|
|
|
|
As long as the encrypted output amounts created, which include an output for the recipient and a change output back to the sender, and the unencrypted transaction fee is equal to the sum of the inputs that are being spent, it is a legitimate transaction and can be confirmed to not be creating Monero out of thin air.
|
|
|
|
Pedersen commitments mean that the sums can be verified as being equal, but the Monero value of each of the sums and the Monero value of the inputs and outputs individually are undeterminable. Pedersen commitments also mean that even the ratio of one input to another, or one output to another is undeterminable.
|
|
|
|
Even though it's unclear which inputs are really being spent (the ring signature lists both the real inputs being spent and decoy inputs therefore you don't actually know which input Pedersen commitments you need to sum) that's okay, because the RingCT ring signature only has to prove is that for one combination of the inputs the outputs are equal to the sum of the inputs. For mathematical reasons, this is impossible to forge.
|
|
|
|
### In-depth Information
|
|
|
|
See information in [Ring Confidential Transactions paper](https://eprint.iacr.org/2015/1098.pdf) by Shen Noether of the Monero Research Lab.
|
|
|
|
{{ page.summary | capitalize }}.
|